| Related: | Personal Finance•Insurance•Car Insurance |
My car was hit by a customer who was driving off without paying for petrol at a petrol station. Just took off a bit of paint so paid for it myself as quote was way lower than excess. The accident was reported the police but plates turned out to be stolen. Whilst getting a quote for new insurance I was asked if there had been anything i'd paid for rather than claimed for. Thought i'd better disclose this as i had reported it to the police. This bit of paint added another ?70 onto my quote! Why ?- i was told it was classed as a liability, how can a bit of paint that was rectified within a week be a liabilty? So not only was i out of pocket for the paint but the insurers are now charging me anyhow. Can they really do this? I would accpet that they could if the car had been structurally damaged, but not a bit of paint work!
Hi carolin52, and welcome to the forum.
They can and they do! I agree with you totally that it's very unfair. I don't understand how that makes you a 'liability' either. Perhaps some of the other forum members can explain it to both of us...
Posts within the money.co.uk community represent the views, experiences and opinions of members only. They should not be taken as financial advice and should not be followed without further research.
Get fast answers to your money questions, Expert insight, top tips & much more...